Analisis Komparatif Biaya Operasional, Perawatan, dan Pajak: Kendaraan Listrik (EV) vs. Kendaraan Konvensional (ICE)

Authors

  • Agus Purwanto PT. Profesor Agus Purwanto Cendekia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v7i4.634

Keywords:

Electric Vehicle, Internal Combustion Engine, Biaya Operasional, Perawatan, Pajak Kendaraan.

Abstract

Transisi global menuju mobilitas berkelanjutan mendorong adopsi Kendaraan Listrik (Electric Vehicle/EV) sebagai alternatif Kendaraan Konvensional (Internal Combustion Engine/ICE). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan total biaya kepemilikan (Total Cost of Ownership) antara EV dan ICE, yang berfokus pada tiga aspek utama: biaya operasional harian, biaya perawatan berkala, dan beban pajak kendaraan. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode wawancara mendalam terhadap 20 informan yang terdiri dari pemilik EV, pemilik ICE, teknisi otomotif, dan regulatur kebijakan, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa EV menawarkan efisiensi biaya operasional hingga 60% lebih murah dan biaya perawatan yang jauh lebih rendah karena jumlah komponen bergerak yang lebih sedikit. Selain itu, insentif fiskal berupa pembebasan atau pengurangan pajak dari pemerintah memberikan keuntungan ekonomis tambahan bagi pengguna EV. Meskipun investasi awal pembelian EV cenderung lebih tinggi, efisiensi jangka panjang pada aspek operasional, perawatan, dan pajak menjadikannya opsi yang lebih ekonomis dibandingkan ICE.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bubeck, S., Tomaschek, J., & Fahl, U. (2016). Perspectives of electric mobility: Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany. Transport Policy, 50, 63-77.

Hagman, J., Ritzén, S., Stier, J. J., & Susilo, Y. (2016). Total cost of ownership and its potential implications for battery electric vehicle diffusion. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 18, 11-17.

Palmer, K., Tate, J. E., Wadud, Z., & Nellthorp, J. (2018). Total cost of ownership and life cycle emissions for electric, hybrid, and conventional vehicles in the UK, USA, and Japan. Applied Energy, 211, 622-635.

Wu, G., Inderbitzin, A., & Bening, C. (2015). Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles compared to conventional vehicles: A probabilistic analysis and projection across market segments. Energy Policy, 80, 196-214.

Propfe, B., Redelbach, M., Santini, D. J., & Friedrich, H. E. (2012). Cost analysis of plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles using a simulation-based total cost of ownership model. Transportation Research Record, 2287(1), 32-40.

Lebeau, K., Lebeau, P., Van Mierlo, J., & Macharis, C. (2012). How total cost of ownership evaluates the acceptance of electric vehicles. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 5(2), 525-532.

Weldon, P., Morrissey, P., & O'Mahony, M. (2018). Long-term cost-benefit analysis of commercial electric vehicles in urban logistics. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 715-726.

Scorrano, M., Danielis, R., & Giansoldati, M. (2020). Disentangling the total cost of ownership of electric vehicles: A consumer perspective. Energy Efficiency, 13(8), 1735-1752.

Choi, H., & Lim, J. (2021). Analysis of consumer preferences and total cost of ownership for electric vehicles under subsidy policy variations. Sustainability, 13(4), 2145.

Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183-194.

Published

2026-11-02

How to Cite

Purwanto, A. (2026). Analisis Komparatif Biaya Operasional, Perawatan, dan Pajak: Kendaraan Listrik (EV) vs. Kendaraan Konvensional (ICE). International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 7(4), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v7i4.634

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>